Sunday, March 22, 2015
Farmer to Hero
“Concord Hymn” by Ralph Waldo Emerson is a poem written in honor of
those who fought for freedom of the colonies in the American Revolutionary War.
In Emerson’s eyes, without these men we would still be slaves of England. The
image he creates of these soldiers leaves the biggest impression. They were “farmers”
who started something that affected the entire world; their shots were “heard
round the world.” Those who fought for their independence from England were not
wealthy or highly educated, they were not even real soldiers; they were
blacksmiths, farmers, even beggars who were all suffering at the hands of
England. They all came together to fight the most powerful military in the
world. These men were able to do so without fear because they knew what they
were fighting for: not themselves, but for future generations. They were
fighting for our freedom, for all Americans today and in the future. Without
their sacrifice who knows where we would be. Unfortunately we sometimes forget
what these men did for us, Emerson tells us in this poem we must honor these
men for their sacrifice, they must never be forgotten. The soldiers who fought
in the war are dead, but the freedom they gave to all Americans lives on.
Emerson first refers to the soldiers as “farmers” but at the end of the poem he
calls them what they really are: “heroes.” These heroes were willing to die for
the freedom of America, and they did not die in vain. These simple colonists
fired a shot that was not only heard around the world, but changed the world.
Without them there would be no United States of America. The United States of
America is the greatest country on the face of the earth and if it were not for
those men in the Revolutionary War, it would not exist. These soldiers must
never be forgotten because even though they are no longer alive, the impact
they made will never die.
Death
“Funeral
Blues” by W. H. Auden is a poem about someone who has lost a man very close to
him/her. The relationship was never revealed (brother, husband, father,
friend?) but clearly their affection for one another was fervent. At the end of
the poem the narrator says the dead man was everything and now that he is gone
there is nothing for him to live for. His life is now full of despair because
he realized that love does not last forever. The poem makes me wonder what I
would do if I lost someone close to me. Would I let it consume more whole life
or would I grow stronger from the experience? I hope I would be able to grow
stronger from the experience. If I lost one of my brothers, or parents, or best
friends I would be distraught emotionally in the beginning. I would probably
react similar to the narrator in this poem, but I cannot let the death ruin my
life because it will not change anything, they will still be dead. More
importantly the person who died would not want me to put a halt on my life
because of them, they would want me to move on and live my life. Love is a
powerful thing: an intense feeling
of deep affection and it does last forever, contrary to what the narrator said.
When a person dies they are physically gone, but it does not mean they
are erased forever, they still live on in memories and they will never be
forgotten. When the narrator says love does not last forever he is right in the
physical sense of love, but you will allows love a person even if they are
gone. When you lose a loved one you never stop loving them because they will
always be with you: in memory.
Fate
The poem “Fate” by Ralph Waldo Emerson describes that an individual’s life
is completely determined by fate and supernatural forces or greater beings control. They can make a
person’s life good or bad without explanation. When a person becomes rich and
famous it is fate, not because of their own hard work and effort. If fate
controls a person’s life what is the point of working hard? According to
Emerson, a person can work hard and have a bad life or put forth minimal effort
and live a bad life. If everyone accepted this no one would do anything, people
would lie around and wait for fate to bring them fortune. A life controlled by
fate means the individual has no power. A person has no control over his/her
life, every decision they make is meaningless. Fate is the sole determinant of
their quality of life. If a person’s destiny is to lead a poor, meaningless
life, then no amount of effort they put forth will ever make a difference. In
the poem, Emerson says that no individual knows their own fate because: it is
incomprehensible. The only person who knows our fate is God, or “The Genius” he
is referred to as in the poem. God created humanity so it is only logical that
he would know our fate. If Emerson is correct and our lives are totally
determined by fate then maybe it is better that only God knows our fate. A
person who knows their fate is to be a millionaire will put forth no effort in
life because they know they are set, and even worse they may develop a smug
attitude towards people whose lives are not as good as theirs. In vice versa, a
person who knows they are destined to be poor and petty may become depressed
with life in general because they know their life will end up bad no matter
what they do. A life ruled by fate is an empty life.
Monday, March 2, 2015
Emerson and Nature
Ralph Waldo Emerson felt a devout
connection with nature, and he displayed it in his literature. Nature appears
simple and emotionless to most, Emerson saw how amazing nature was. He saw not
only its beauty and grace, but he also understood its power and potential for
destruction. For me when I think about nature I instantly think about the cliché
things: first snowfall, sunsets, beaches, etc. I think about nature in the
generic way, but when I read Emerson’s poetry I see how much more to nature
there really is. The most obvious thing Emerson’s poetry made me realize was
nature’s disparaging capabilities. I hear every day about a blizzard, a
hurricane, or tornado causing destruction, yet that is not what first comes to
mind when I think of nature, I only think of clichés and Emerson made me
realize that. “Water” is one of Emerson’s simpler poems but it is still a
prototype of Emerson’s theme in a nature poem. “Water” is a short twelve line
poem with simple language, but it gets across a powerful message. The subject
is obvious from the title, “Water” is about water, but even though it is about
one particular thing in nature its theme can be applied to all of nature. In
the poem, Emerson gives water and nature, inanimate and emotionless, feelings.
He makes it appear as simple and calm in the beginning, but as it progresses it
gains greater significance. Water and nature can be glorious when used
properly, although when used wrongly it can cause great destruction. Emerson’s
nature poetry leaves me in awe of nature’s power but also makes me appreciate
its beauty more. It makes me want to preserve the beauty of nature so that my
great- great- great- grandson can still admire nature’s beauty. A lot of people,
like me, say we “love” nature, but we are frauds in comparison to Emerson. We are
in love with nature’s beauty, and while Emerson loves nature’s beauty he also
sees so much more in nature. He realizes nature is not just meant to look “pretty”
he comprehends that nature is complex: be glorious and calm and simple, but at
the same time it has the ability to cause destruction. Emerson is in awe of
nature and his poetry is able to instill the same feeling in the reader.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)